TODAY▼ZN back 4.1%→3.65%▼ZN score band down to Moderate▼PB back -1.92%→-2.21%vs prior day
01
The Main Tension
The one thing to know today
Zinc ZNRisk level ModerateConcentration and front-end structure
Zinc takes the lead as concentration and backwardation converge
The score is 49, up from 55; registered/on-warrant stock is down +16.2% over a month. Cash–3M is +150.8 $/t (3.65%), near its 22-day high; the cumulative public OI proxy through M1 is about 10.0× on-warrant stock, with 6 trading days to M1. Cash holdings include a 50-80% holder. The 50–80% band is subject to LME lending guidance, which partially brakes an extreme premium: this is elevated delivery-structure risk, not an inevitable or unbounded squeeze.
Score: 49 (prior 55)Cash–3M: +150.8 $/t · near 22-day highCash holdings: 50–80% band · lending guidance partly brakes extreme premiumExport parity: ~1,160 yuan/t away; not confirmed open
Registered warrants (deliverable)
85.8 kt
1M +16.2%
Cash–3M
+150.8 $/t
near 22-day high · 3.65%37d p89
To M1 (09-16)
6 trading days
cumulative OI proxy 34,154 lots ≈ 10.0× on-warrant
Six-metal risk map
y risk level · x cancelled% · bubble = cumulative public OI through M1 ÷ on-warrant
Zinc: on-warrant vs total inventory (kt)
On-warrant is the deliverable waterline; total inventory includes cancelled stock, so the gap is a buffer.
LME on-warrantLME total inventory (on-warrant + cancelled)
Zinc Cash–3M: trend and acceleration
Solid is the front-end premium; dashed is the day-over-day change, showing whether pressure is still building.
Validate the inputs before calling a relief valve open
Confirmed open0 / 6Only checked windows count
Same-day dual-session coverage6 / 6AM checks direction · PM is production
Production exceptions0No stale or material conflict in production
Closest to parityLead PB +115±250 yuan/t treated as noise
Import / export window matrix
The track preserves SHFE/LME geometry; P&L, window state and data quality are separated for clarity
Latest PM · 2026-09-08
Metal & qualitySHFE/LME positionImport P&L
Lead PBNear parity
Export 5.72Now 8.55Import 8.49
+115yuan/t · Near parity
Copper CUDual-session checked
Export 6.00Now 7.54Import 7.61
-1,013yuan/t · Import closed
Nickel NIDual-session checked
Export 5.67Now 7.62Import 7.69
-1,180yuan/t · Import closed
Aluminium ALDual-session checked
Export 5.52Now 7.33Import 8.26
-3,119yuan/t · Import closed
Zinc ZNDual-session checked
Export 6.56Now 6.85Import 7.93
-4,327yuan/t · Import closed
Tin SNDual-session checked
Export 6.03Now 7.68Import 7.88
-10,613yuan/t · Import closed
Import P&L uses the latest same-day PM main contract, with AM checking direction. Export P&L remains a BW estimate; sources and parameters are not disclosed publicly.
Copper · import P&L (yuan/t)
History keeps a comparable daily basis; the final point uses latest same-day PM
-1,013yuan/t
Nickel · import P&L (yuan/t)
History keeps a comparable daily basis; the final point uses latest same-day PM
-1,180yuan/t
Detail table · stocks & window P&L▾
Metal
LME stock
SHFE stock*
COMEX stock
SHFE receipts
Import P&L
Export P&L est.
Read
Zinc ZN
115.4 kt
148.7 kt (-5,008)
3.0 kt
91,597 (-25)
-4,327Dual-session checked
-1,160near
About 1,160 yuan/t from export parity; if it opens, Chinese metal flows back offshore via Southeast Asia
Tin SN
5.3 kt
6.5 kt (+118)
—
—
-10,613Dual-session checked
-90,492
Both same-day AM and PM observations are negative; the import window is closed
Copper CU
237.7 kt
63.0 kt (-9,428)
766.8 kt
21,412 (-1,903)
-1,013Dual-session checked
-22,790
LME is draining while COMEX holds 767kt; import P&L is -1,013 yuan/t and the window remains closed
Aluminium AL
244.5 kt
364.7 kt (-26,796)
1.3 kt
217,177 (-2,697)
-3,119Dual-session checked
-6,049
Import P&L is -3,119 yuan/t; SHFE stocks are 364.7kt and the window is firmly shut
Nickel NI
271.0 kt
111.4 kt (-728)
—
99,179 (-268)
-1,180Dual-session checked
-32,687
PM is negative and AM/PM straddle zero, so the window is near parity
Lead PB
385.1 kt
73.8 kt (+697)
1.4 kt
57,742 (+0)
+115Near parity
-5,346
Inside the noise band; treated as near parity, not a confirmed opening
* SHFE stocks are weekly (04-Sep-26); COMEX copper is read as reported; import P&L uses latest same-day PM with AM as a direction check.
The deepest backwardation of the six (3.6%); stocks and concentration tightening together
Closing stock
115.4 kt
+2.3k d/d · 1w +16.4%
On-warrant stock
85.8 kt
1M +16.2%
Cancellation ratio
25.7%
1w -5.5pp
Cash–3M
+150.8
back 3.65% · 1w +201.037d p89
Off-warrant (T-3)
14.2 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M) (09-04)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs on-warrant stock (lots) · BANDS OCR + Bloomberg (09-04)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed on-warrant stock in lot-equivalent; shading = countdown to M1; ↺ = daily change unavailable
The cumulative public prompt-OI proxy through M1 (2026-09-16) is 34,154 lots ≈ 854kt — 10.0× on-warrant stock.
Futures position banding (09-04 · Bloomberg)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
SEP26L
31
S
22
OCT26L
21
S
21
NOV26L
4
S
31
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (09-04)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
×1
Tom exposure
×1
Cash exposure
×1
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
Holder ≥50% on the books · lending guidance activeIf concentration and the inventory side ever align, the picture changes quickly. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on zincINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingDays on the 50-80% band, and the migration pathINTERNAL
Tin SNRisk level ModerateCancel 25.5%C-3M -322Cover 4.4×▼ expand
Very thin absolute stock (5.3kt); structure is sensitive to any single participant
Closing stock
5.3 kt
-0.1k d/d · 1w -3.4%
On-warrant stock
4.0 kt
1M -23.8%37d low
Cancellation ratio
25.5%
1w +13.3pp37d #3 high
Cash–3M
-321.9
contango 0.59% · 1w -359.0
Off-warrant (T-3)
1.5 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M) (09-04)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs on-warrant stock (lots) · BANDS OCR + Bloomberg (09-04)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed on-warrant stock in lot-equivalent; shading = countdown to M1; ↺ = daily change unavailable
The cumulative public prompt-OI proxy through M1 (2026-09-16) is 3,479 lots ≈ 17kt — 4.4× on-warrant stock.
Futures position banding (09-04 · Bloomberg)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
SEP26L
3
S
31
OCT26L
11
S
211
NOV26L
41
S
42
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (09-04)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
×1
Tom exposure
×1
Cash exposure
×1
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
Holders present in the 30-50% bandsIn the escalation-watch zone; concentration and cancellation momentum will decide direction. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on tinINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingDays on the 40-50% band, and the migration pathINTERNAL
“What do you deliver?” — cumulative public OI through M1 runs ~8× on-warrant stock, 6 trading days to M1
Closing stock
237.7 kt
+1.2k d/d · 1w +1.8%
On-warrant stock
116.5 kt
1M +23.7%
Cancellation ratio
51.0%
1w -1.4pp
Cash–3M
+78.3
back 0.54% · 1w +151.6
Off-warrant (T-3)
115.6 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M) (09-04)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs on-warrant stock (lots) · BANDS OCR + Bloomberg (09-04)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed on-warrant stock in lot-equivalent; shading = countdown to M1; ↺ = daily change unavailable
The cumulative public prompt-OI proxy through M1 (2026-09-16) is 39,815 lots ≈ 995kt — 8.5× on-warrant stock.
Futures position banding (09-04 · Bloomberg)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
SEP26L
2
S
2
OCT26L
2
S
1
NOV26L
4
S
1
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (09-04)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
Tom exposure
Cash exposure
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
No significant concentration in the Holdings reportIn the escalation-watch zone; concentration and cancellation momentum will decide direction. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on copperINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingBand migration path and persistenceINTERNAL
Concentrated but capped by lending guidance; the inventory side stays loose
Closing stock
244.5 kt
+0.0k d/d · 1w -0.9%
On-warrant stock
240.8 kt
1M -1.6%38d low
Cancellation ratio
1.5%
1w -0.2pp
Cash–3M
+1.7
back 0.05% · 1w -7.6
Off-warrant (T-3)
96.2 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M) (09-04)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs on-warrant stock (lots) · BANDS OCR + Bloomberg (09-04)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed on-warrant stock in lot-equivalent; shading = countdown to M1; ↺ = daily change unavailable
The cumulative public prompt-OI proxy through M1 (2026-09-16) is 64,044 lots ≈ 1,601kt — 6.6× on-warrant stock.
Futures position banding (09-04 · Bloomberg)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
SEP26L
1
S
1
OCT26L
4
S
21
NOV26L
4
S
32
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (09-04)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
×1
Tom exposure
×1
Cash exposure
×1
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
Holders present in the 30-50% bandsLoose on every dimension; nothing on the near-term watch list. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on aluminiumINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingDays on the 30-40% band, and the migration pathINTERNAL
Loose across the board; the import window remains closed after cross-checking
Closing stock
271.0 kt
+0.3k d/d · 1w +0.9%
On-warrant stock
257.3 kt
1M +0.5%
Cancellation ratio
5.1%
1w +1.3pp
Cash–3M
-161.3
contango 0.97% · 1w -160.3
Off-warrant (T-3)
101.5 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M) (09-04)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs on-warrant stock (lots) · BANDS OCR + Bloomberg (09-04)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed on-warrant stock in lot-equivalent; shading = countdown to M1; ↺ = daily change unavailable
The cumulative public prompt-OI proxy through M1 (2026-09-16) is 47,254 lots ≈ 284kt — 1.1× on-warrant stock.
Futures position banding (09-04 · Bloomberg)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
SEP26L
31
S
411
OCT26L
41
S
5
NOV26L
32
S
12
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (09-04)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
Tom exposure
Cash exposure
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
No significant concentration in the Holdings reportLoose on every dimension; nothing on the near-term watch list. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on nickelINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingBand migration path and persistenceINTERNAL
Lead PBRisk level LowCancel 10.1%C-3M -41Cover 1.7×▼ expand
Loose on both ends
Closing stock
385.1 kt
-3.4k d/d · 1w -4.8%
On-warrant stock
346.1 kt
1M -4.3%
Cancellation ratio
10.1%
1w -2.6pp
Cash–3M
-41.0
contango 2.21% · 1w -32.2
Off-warrant (T-3)
56.7 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M) (09-04)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs on-warrant stock (lots) · BANDS OCR + Bloomberg (09-04)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed on-warrant stock in lot-equivalent; shading = countdown to M1; ↺ = daily change unavailable
The cumulative public prompt-OI proxy through M1 (2026-09-16) is 23,189 lots ≈ 580kt — 1.7× on-warrant stock.
Futures position banding (09-04 · Bloomberg)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
SEP26L
41
S
41
OCT26L
31
S
6
NOV26L
41
S
11
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (09-04)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
Tom exposure
Cash exposure
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
No significant concentration in the Holdings reportLoose on every dimension; nothing on the near-term watch list. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on leadINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingBand migration path and persistenceINTERNAL
The score aggregates five structural dimensions — concentration, a cumulative public OI proxy through M1, momentum and spread confirmation among them — under fixed, auditable rules. Dimension definitions, weights and trigger levels are internal-edition content; the public edition shows risk levels and direction only.
LME Tom-Next lending rules
Position*
Max tom-next lending premium
50–79.99%
0.5% of prior cash price
80–89.99%
0.25% of prior cash price
90–100%
At level (no premium)
* Warrants + Tom + Cash ÷ live warrants. Tightness without a ≥50% holder has no such cap on the spread.
LME Front Month Lending Rules (effective 17 Mar 2026)
Cumulative Spot Futures Position / Total Available Stock
Maximum M1 lending premium
50–79.99%
3% of prior M1 official close
80–89.99%
1.5%
90–100%
At level
LME Notice 26/049. The official ratio needs member/client cumulative net positions and Total Available Stock, neither reproducible from public data. This report's all-market prompt OI through M1 divided by on-warrant stock is a conservative public proxy, not the official ratio or a breach test.
Data chain & lags
Reports are archived at 06:30 SGT. The workflow allows a measured 75-minute source buffer and starts at 19:30 SGT (the release guard defers winter runs to 20:15), retrying every 15 minutes through 23:30. Banding, Holdings, and OI each use and independently validate the Data Date printed on their source report; stocks/prices are T-1, while off-warrant stock is a T-3 voluntary disclosure and a floor estimate.
Data quality
This issue's sentinels: 0 missing OI rows backfilled from the prior snapshot (dashed in charts), 1 low-confidence banding rows flagged, 2 curve outliers excluded, 1 stock row(s) dropped on internal-consistency checks. A stock row that fails internal consistency (on-warrant + cancelled must equal total) is treated as an upstream OCR column shift and dropped in full for that date. Nothing unreliable is silently kept.
Disclaimer
This report is market-structure research for reference only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer or a solicitation; you act on it at your own risk. Built on official LME publications (T+2 lag); contains no real-time prices; no warranty is given as to accuracy, completeness or timeliness.