The world isn't short of copper. The LME is short of warrants.
Registered warrants have fallen to 166.8kt in a month (+26.8%), with the cancellation ratio pinned near 30%. Over the same stretch COMEX stocks climbed to a record 741kt and another 143kt sits off-warrant in LME sheds — the copper exists; it just isn't deliverable. Cash–3M has run from +162 to +77 (0.54%) in a week, and the Holdings report shows no one above 50% — which means no lending-guidance cap. This backwardation is unanchored: no rule puts a ceiling on it (contrast aluminium, where a 50–80% holder's lending obligation pins the spread). The import window is shut and exports are blocked by duty; China's two exchanges hold 87kt combined — less than the LME's own warrant pool. The nearest third-Wednesday delivery date is 18 trading days away.
Validate the inputs before calling a relief valve open
Confirmed open0 / 6Only checked windows count
Same-day dual-session coverage6 / 6AM checks direction · PM is production
Production exceptions0No stale or material conflict in production
Closest to parityLead PB +177±250 yuan/t treated as noise
Import / export window matrix
The track preserves SHFE/LME geometry; P&L, window state and data quality are separated for clarity
Latest PM None · 2026-08-20
Metal & qualitySHFE/LME positionImport P&L
Lead PBNear parity
Export 5.72Now 8.58Import 8.49
+177yuan/t · Near parity
Copper CUNear parity
Export 6.00Now 7.65Import 7.63
+276yuan/t · Positive, unconfirmed
Nickel NIDual-session checked
Export 5.67Now 7.67Import 7.71
-581yuan/t · Import closed
Aluminium ALDual-session checked
Export 5.52Now 7.36Import 8.33
-3,120yuan/t · Import closed
Zinc ZNDual-session checked
Export 6.55Now 6.83Import 7.97
-4,215yuan/t · Import closed
Tin SNDual-session checked
Export 6.03Now 7.67Import 7.89
-12,055yuan/t · Import closed
Import P&L uses the latest same-day PM main contract, with AM checking direction. Export P&L remains a BW estimate; sources and parameters are not disclosed publicly.
Copper · import P&L (yuan/t)
History keeps a comparable daily basis; the final point uses latest same-day PM
+276yuan/t
Nickel · import P&L (yuan/t)
History keeps a comparable daily basis; the final point uses latest same-day PM
-581yuan/t
Detail table · stocks & window P&L▾
Metal
LME stock
SHFE stock*
COMEX stock
SHFE receipts
Import P&L
Export P&L est.
Read
Copper CU
239.9 kt
69.7 kt (-385)
741.3 kt
53,079 (-3,619)
+276Near parity
-23,075
LME is draining while COMEX holds 741kt; import P&L is +276 yuan/t and the window remains closed
Zinc ZN
94.4 kt
—
3.0 kt
115,060 (-1)
-4,215Dual-session checked
-1,049near
About 1,049 yuan/t from export parity; if it opens, Chinese metal flows back offshore via Southeast Asia
Aluminium AL
246.9 kt
—
1.6 kt
285,231 (-5,305)
-3,120Dual-session checked
-5,908
Import P&L is -3,120 yuan/t; SHFE stocks are 0.0kt and the window is firmly shut
Tin SN
5.4 kt
6.0 kt (+516)
—
—
-12,055Dual-session checked
-90,859
Both same-day AM and PM observations are negative; the import window is closed
Lead PB
417.1 kt
—
1.4 kt
63,918 (-1,572)
+177Near parity
-5,299
Inside the noise band; treated as near parity, not a confirmed opening
Nickel NI
268.2 kt
—
—
102,197 (+199)
-581Dual-session checked
-33,782
PM is negative and AM/PM straddle zero, so the window is near parity
* SHFE stocks are weekly (14-Aug-26); COMEX copper is read as reported; import P&L uses latest same-day PM with AM as a direction check.
“What do you deliver?” — front-month exposure runs ~1× the deliverable pool, 18 trading days out
Closing stock
239.9 kt
+4.0k d/d · 1w +13.1%
On-warrant stock
166.8 kt
1M +26.8%
Cancellation ratio
30.5%
1w -26.6pp
Cash–3M
+76.7
back 0.54% · 1w +162.2
Off-warrant (T-3)
142.5 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs the warrant water line (lots)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed the entire deliverable pool; shading = countdown to the nearest 3rd Wednesday; ↺ = backfilled from the prior snapshot
Front-month prompt OI totals 5,050 lots ≈ 126kt — 0.8× the registered warrant pool.
Futures position banding (08-18)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
L
3
S
1
L
2
S
1
L
11
S
1
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (08-18)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
Tom exposure
×1×1
Cash exposure
×1×1
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
Holder ≥50% on the books · lending guidance activeIf concentration and the inventory side ever align, the picture changes quickly. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on copperINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingDays on the 50-80% band, and the migration pathINTERNAL
The deepest backwardation of the six (3.4%); stocks and concentration tightening together
Closing stock
94.4 kt
-0.7k d/d · 1w -1.0%
On-warrant stock
88.2 kt
1M +4.7%
Cancellation ratio
6.5%
1w -14.9pp
Cash–3M
+132.4
back 3.40% · 1w +77.226d high
Off-warrant (T-3)
25.3 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs the warrant water line (lots)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed the entire deliverable pool; shading = countdown to the nearest 3rd Wednesday; ↺ = backfilled from the prior snapshot
Front-month prompt OI totals 5,743 lots ≈ 144kt — 1.6× the registered warrant pool.
Futures position banding (08-18)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
L
3
S
41
L
41
S
41
L
3
S
22
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (08-18)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
×1
Tom exposure
×1
Cash exposure
×1×1
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
Holder ≥50% on the books · lending guidance activeIf concentration and the inventory side ever align, the picture changes quickly. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on zincINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingDays on the 50-80% band, and the migration pathINTERNAL
Concentrated but capped by lending guidance; the inventory side stays loose
Closing stock
246.9 kt
+0.0k d/d · 1w -1.9%
On-warrant stock
244.5 kt
1M -0.6%26d low
Cancellation ratio
1.0%
1w -1.8pp
Cash–3M
-13.1
contango 0.41% · 1w +4.6
Off-warrant (T-3)
87.3 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs the warrant water line (lots)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed the entire deliverable pool; shading = countdown to the nearest 3rd Wednesday; ↺ = backfilled from the prior snapshot
Front-month prompt OI totals 9,572 lots ≈ 239kt — 1.0× the registered warrant pool.
Futures position banding (08-18)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
L
12
S
3
L
4
S
31
L
31
S
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (08-18)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
×1
Tom exposure
×1
Cash exposure
×1
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
Holder ≥50% on the books · lending guidance activeIf concentration and the inventory side ever align, the picture changes quickly. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on aluminiumINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingDays on the 50-80% band, and the migration pathINTERNAL
Tin SNRisk level LowCancel 11.1%C-3M -345Cover 0.9×▼ expand
Very thin absolute stock (5.4kt); structure is sensitive to any single participant
Closing stock
5.4 kt
-0.1k d/d · 1w -2.9%
On-warrant stock
4.8 kt
1M -23.3%
Cancellation ratio
11.1%
1w -3.3pp
Cash–3M
-345.0
contango 0.62% · 1w -268.0
Off-warrant (T-3)
1.8 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs the warrant water line (lots)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed the entire deliverable pool; shading = countdown to the nearest 3rd Wednesday; ↺ = backfilled from the prior snapshot
Front-month prompt OI totals 910 lots ≈ 5kt — 0.9× the registered warrant pool.
Futures position banding (08-18)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
L
22
S
21
L
11
S
22
L
6
S
52
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (08-18)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
×1
Tom exposure
×1
Cash exposure
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
Holders present in the 30-50% bandsLoose on every dimension; nothing on the near-term watch list. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on tinINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingDays on the 30-40% band, and the migration pathINTERNAL
Lead PBRisk level LowCancel 11.3%C-3M -41Cover 0.3×▼ expand
Loose on both ends
Closing stock
417.1 kt
-1.5k d/d · 1w +0.0%
On-warrant stock
369.8 kt
1M -15.0%
Cancellation ratio
11.3%
1w -2.1pp
Cash–3M
-40.7
contango 2.19% · 1w -42.5
Off-warrant (T-3)
47.0 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs the warrant water line (lots)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed the entire deliverable pool; shading = countdown to the nearest 3rd Wednesday; ↺ = backfilled from the prior snapshot
Front-month prompt OI totals 4,121 lots ≈ 103kt — 0.3× the registered warrant pool.
Futures position banding (08-18)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
L
12
S
12
L
51
S
5
L
4
S
21
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (08-18)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
Tom exposure
×1
Cash exposure
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
Holders present in the 30-50% bandsLoose on every dimension; nothing on the near-term watch list. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on leadINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingDays on the 30-40% band, and the migration pathINTERNAL
Loose across the board; the import window remains closed after cross-checking
Closing stock
268.2 kt
+2.9k d/d · 1w +1.3%
On-warrant stock
259.2 kt
1M +0.4%
Cancellation ratio
3.4%
1w +0.1pp
Cash–3M
-166.4
contango 1.00% · 1w -206.926d high
Off-warrant (T-3)
101.9 kt
below on-warrant
Stock structure (1M, daily)
Stack = closing stock
On-warrantCancelled
Cancellation ratio (1M)
cancelled ÷ closing stock
Cash–3M spread (1M)
Positive = backwardation; T-1
MOC front curve (to +3M)
By prompt date; downward slope = backwardation
The delivery horizon — prompt OI vs the warrant water line (lots)
Every prompt at its true calendar date; needles above the red line exceed the entire deliverable pool; shading = countdown to the nearest 3rd Wednesday; ↺ = backfilled from the prior snapshot
Front-month prompt OI totals 2,863 lots ≈ 17kt — 0.1× the registered warrant pool.
Futures position banding (08-18)
Band scale: occupied segments light up; further right = more concentrated
5-9%10-19%20-29%30-39%40%+
L
31
S
42
L
41
S
4
L
21
S
32
Cell value = number of holders in that band (as of the data date). The further right the longs sit, the stronger the potential pull on the front of the curve.
Warrant / Tom / Cash holdings concentration (08-18)
The closer to the red line, the closer to the mandatory-lending zone
▲ 50% lending-guidance line
30-40%40-50%50-80%80-90%90%+
Warrant holdings
Tom exposure
Cash exposure
Crossing the red line triggers the LME lending-guidance obligation (50-80%: lend tom-next at ≤0.5% of cash/day; 80-90%: ≤0.25%; 90%+: at level).
No significant concentration in the Holdings reportLoose on every dimension; nothing on the near-term watch list. Structural observations only; not investment advice.
INTERNAL-EDITION SECTIONS
Desk viewSame-day desk read and risk flags on nickelINTERNAL
Score decomposition & watch levelsWhat builds the composite score — and the trigger levelsINTERNAL
Day-by-day band trackingBand migration path and persistenceINTERNAL
The score aggregates five structural dimensions — concentration, coverage, momentum and spread confirmation among them — under fixed rules; fully rule-based and auditable. Dimension definitions, weights and trigger levels are internal-edition content; the public edition shows risk levels (Low/Moderate/High/Extreme) and direction only.
LME lending guidance
Position*
Max tom-next lending premium
50–79.99%
0.5% of prior cash price
80–89.99%
0.25% of prior cash price
90–100%
At level (no premium)
* Warrants + Tom + Cash ÷ live warrants. Tightness without a ≥50% holder has no such cap on the spread.
Data chain & lags
LME official reports captured daily at 06:30 SGT into structured factor tables. Stocks/prices are T-1; banding and holdings are published by the LME on a T+2 basis; off-warrant stock is a T-3 voluntary disclosure and a floor estimate.
Data quality
This issue's sentinels: 4 missing OI rows backfilled from the prior snapshot (dashed in charts), 4 low-confidence banding rows flagged, 1 curve outliers excluded, 1 stock row(s) dropped on internal-consistency checks. A stock row that fails internal consistency (on-warrant + cancelled must equal total) is treated as an upstream OCR column shift and dropped in full for that date. Nothing unreliable is silently kept.
Disclaimer
This report is market-structure research for reference only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer or a solicitation; you act on it at your own risk. Built on official LME publications (T+2 lag); contains no real-time prices; no warranty is given as to accuracy, completeness or timeliness.